Same projects. Different combination. Greater results.
You can achieve higher returns with your existing projects.
We calculate the optimum scenario - before you decide.
Free of charge. Without obligation. Based on your existing projects.
StratePlan calculates the optimal portfolio where traditional tools reach their limits.
Instead of evaluating projects in isolation, we analyze all possible combinations - and identify the best solution.
The global optimum is not an assumption - it can be calculated.
Select business area:
Blog main article:
Municipal AI - from local optima to the global optimum
Municipal decisions rarely arise in a vacuum. They are made under time pressure, budget constraints, political goal conflicts, and growing complexity.
In practice, this often leads to a familiar pattern: The locally best project is chosen – not the globally best portfolio.
This is precisely where the strategic relevance of municipal AI begins.
Local optima: plausible, but systematically incomplete
In traditional budget and investment processes, projects are usually considered individually:
- Project A is reasonable
- Project B is necessary
- Project C is politically desired
Each of these decisions can be correct in isolation. The problem arises between the projects:
- Budgets compete
- Funding logics overlap
- Timelines influence outcomes
- Combinations generate new effects
The result is often a local optimum: A decision that is convincing in direct comparison, but not maximally effective within the overall portfolio.
Why municipalities are exponential systems
As soon as multiple projects are up for decision at the same time, a municipality leaves the linear space.
Even with just a few projects, the decision space grows exponentially. With 50 projects, a space emerges that can no longer be “thought” – only calculated.
This makes clear why human intuition, Excel models, and traditional software inevitably reach their limits:
A comparison of scale:
our Milky Way and a municipal decision space with “only” 50 projects
of 1.125 quadrillion possible project combinations
The central fallacy: projects instead of portfolios
The decisive difference between a local and a global optimum lies not in the individual project, but in the interaction of all projects.
A local optimum answers the question:
Is this project sensible?
A global optimum answers the question:
Which combination of all projects maximizes total impact under all constraints?
This second question cannot be answered intuitively.
From selection to calculation
Modern municipal AI such as StratePlan does not evaluate projects in isolation, but as part of a complete decision space.
Not sequentially – but simultaneously.
Municipal AI in this context does not mean automation. It means ex-ante optimization.
What is not calculated is guessed
In traditional decision-making processes, choices are often made from a small number of scenarios. Mathematically, this is nothing more than guessing within the decision space.
With 50 projects, every decision that is not fully calculated corresponds to a choice from more than one quadrillion possibilities – without knowing how close one actually is to the global optimum.
Global optimum: politically neutral, technically robust
A global optimum is not a political decision. It is a mathematical statement:
Given defined goals, budgets, and constraints, exactly one portfolio exists with maximum total impact.
Modern municipal AI makes this portfolio visible:
- transparent
- comprehensible
- audit-proof
Political bodies continue to decide – but for the first time on the basis of the entire decision space, not just a fragment of it.
Conclusion: from gut feeling to calculability
Municipalities do not fail due to a lack of competence. They fail due to exponential complexity.
The step from local optima to a global optimum is not cultural, but mathematical.
Municipal AI means:
- less guessing
- fewer opportunity losses
- more impact per euro
and above all: decisions that do justice to the entire space of possibilities.