Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

Same projects. Different combination. Greater results.

You can achieve higher returns with your existing projects.

We calculate the optimum scenario - before you decide.

Free of charge. Without obligation. Based on your existing projects.

StratePlan calculates the optimal portfolio where traditional tools reach their limits.

Instead of evaluating projects in isolation, we analyze all possible combinations - and identify the best solution.

The global optimum is not an assumption - it can be calculated.

Select business area:

Calculate KPI with AI ex ante


We do not measure KPIs – we calculate the optimal decision beforehand This sentence marks a fundamental paradigm shift in corporate management. For decades, KPIs were considered the central management instrument: measure, compare, report, correct. In a_attach world of growing complexity, increasing uncertainty, and exponentially expanding decision spaces, this principle hits a hard limit. Not because KPIs are wrong – but because they come too late.

For board members, CEOs, CFOs, and public decision-makers, the key question today is no longer how well a decision performed in hindsight, but which decision is mathematically optimal before implementation. This is precisely where the ex-ante approach begins: not evaluating decisions after they have been made, but calculating them in advance.

StratePlan stands exactly for this shift in perspective. KPIs remain relevant – but no longer as retrospective metrics, rather as target parameters within a fully calculated decision space.

Calculate KPI ex ante online now

The illusion of control through KPIs

KPIs convey a sense of control. They suggest objectivity, comparability, and manageability. In practice, however, they often primarily serve to explain the past. Revenue, EBIT, margin, utilization, CO₂ ratio, impact metrics, or budget indicators in the public sector – all of these figures describe what has happened. They do not indicate whether a different combination of projects, investments, or measures would have delivered a better overall result.

The real problem lies deeper: KPIs are optimized in isolation. Each department pursues its own targets, often with contradictory effects on the overall system. Sales maximizes revenue, controlling minimizes costs, operations optimizes utilization, sustainability reduces emissions. The result is rarely an optimum – but rather a compromise.

In simple systems, this approach may work. In complex organizations with dozens of projects, billion-euro budgets, and political or regulatory constraints, it is structurally insufficient.

Decisions are not made in the project – but in the decision space

Every strategic decision is, in truth, a selection from a vast space of possible combinations. Projects are approved or rejected, budgets allocated, priorities set. Even with a small number of projects, the number of possible portfolios explodes exponentially.

50 projects do not generate 50 decision options – but 250 possible combinations. That is more than one quadrillion alternatives. No executive board, no committee, no Excel model can even remotely grasp this space.

This is exactly where the blind spot of classic KPI logic arises: it evaluates individual paths, not the entire space. It optimizes locally, not globally.

1 out of 1.125 quadrillion – guess or calculate?
Impact / cost efficiency
What is not calculated is guessed
1 : 1.125 quadrillion decision combinations

Measuring ex post is convenient – calculating ex ante is decisive

Why do KPIs nevertheless dominate management control? Because they are simple. They can be reported, visualized, and communicated. They fit linear thinking. But convenience is not a criterion for strategic quality.

Ex-ante optimization means confronting the full complexity. Trade-offs are not ignored, but mathematically integrated. Budget constraints, capacity limits, regulatory requirements, risk aversions, and political objectives are not debated – they are modeled.

The central question is no longer: “How are our KPIs developing?” But rather: “Which combination of decisions maximizes our goal achievement under real-world constraints?”

KPIs as an objective function – not as a control instrument

StratePlan reverses the logic. KPIs are not abolished; they are elevated. They become part of an objective function. Revenue, impact, return, risk, sustainability, or social effects are weighted, calculated against each other, and placed in relation.

The result is not a metric – but a decision. A concrete, prioritized selection of projects, investments, or measures that represents the global optimum.

This avoids a fundamental error: the retrospective justification of suboptimal decisions using good-looking individual metrics.


Why human intuition systematically fails here

Humans are excellent decision-makers in manageable situations. However, they are not designed to penetrate exponential spaces. From around seven simultaneous decision options, the number of possible combinations grows faster than our brains can comprehend.

In corporations, ministries, or cities, we are not talking about seven, but about fifty, one hundred, or more projects. Intuition, experience, and gut feeling inevitably become approximations. Approximations are costly in strategic contexts – not because they are wrong, but because they are almost never optimal.

A comparison of scale that creates clarity

A comparison of scale:

our Milky Way and a corporate decision space with “only” 50 projects
Our Milky Way has 100–400 billion stars



~1011
A large German corporation with 50 projects has a decision space
of 1.125 quadrillion possible project combinations

~1015
A large-corporation decision space has more possible combinations than the Milky Way has stars.

What StratePlan actually delivers

StratePlan delivers no recommendation, no forecast, and no dashboard. It delivers a mathematically calculated decision. A decision that guarantees the best possible target achievement among all permissible combinations – within the defined parameters.

For management, this represents a qualitative leap: away from discussions about assumptions, toward transparency about cause-and-effect relationships. Decisions are not delegated, but substantiated.

The ex-ante advantage for decision-makers

The true added value does not lie in better KPIs, but in avoided opportunity costs. Every unchosen alternative has a foregone benefit. Classical management makes these costs invisible. Ex-ante optimization makes them explicit.

For board members and political decision-makers, this is decisive: responsibility does not mean making decisions – it means making the best possible decision.

Conclusion: KPIs remain – but they lose their dominance

KPIs are not obsolete. They are necessary, but not sufficient. In a world of exponential decision spaces, measurement alone is no longer enough. Calculation becomes mandatory.

We do not measure KPIs – we calculate the optimal decision beforehand. This is not a slogan. It is the logical consequence of mathematical reality, technological maturity, and strategic responsibility.

StratePlan stands precisely for this step. Ex ante. Global. Optimal.

Author: Dr. Igor Kadoshchuk CTO mAInthink

Dr. Igor Kadoshchuk is a computer scientist, algorithm architect, and one of the leading minds behind mAInthink's optimization and decision-making algorithms. As scientific director of the StratePlan™ and DeepAnT platforms, he combines in-depth mathematical research with practical applications in project portfolio optimization, business, finance, and public administration.

He holds a PhD in computer science from the renowned Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT), where he also taught as a professor of computer engineering and mathematics. He has decades of experience developing highly complex mathematical models for project portfolio optimization and financial systems, investment planning, and strategic decision-making. His professional career includes leading positions such as Head of IT at Gazprombank and Director of Project Management at TransTeleCom.

Dr. Kadoshchuk writes on the mAInthink AI Blog. Kadoshchuk on:

  • Algorithmic strategy optimization
  • New methods for calculating ROI and impact
  • Project portfolio optimization beyond traditional tools
  • The limits of human decision-making – and how AI overcomes them

His aim: to calculate strategy, not estimate it.

His contributions combine scientific precision with clear, understandable language – always with the goal of making complex decision-making spaces transparent, manageable, and measurable.

Industry / CAPEX

End guesswork for investments in the millions

Calculate business and investment decisions now
Check investment potential

Public Sector

Too many projects, too little budget

Calculate more projects with the same budget
Analyze budget potential
Subscribe to newsletter
Privacy
By selecting continue you confirm that you have read our and accepted our .
Fields marked with asterisks (*) are required.