Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

Same projects. Different combination. Greater results.

You can achieve higher returns with your existing projects.

We calculate the optimum scenario - before you decide.

Free of charge. Without obligation. Based on your existing projects.

StratePlan calculates the optimal portfolio where traditional tools reach their limits.

Instead of evaluating projects in isolation, we analyze all possible combinations - and identify the best solution.

The global optimum is not an assumption - it can be calculated.

Select business area:

Calculating the decision space with hybrid AI: Why strategic quality depends not on intuition but on full combination analysis


Executive Summary

Every strategic decision does not exist in isolation. It is part of a decision space - a structured totality of all possible alternatives, combinations and consequences. In simple situations, this space is manageable. In real strategic contexts - such as investment portfolios, infrastructure programs or CapEx planning - it grows exponentially.

The critical point is that the quality of a decision is not determined by the evaluation of individual options, but by the ability to analyze the entire decision space and identify the globally optimal combination. Without this complete analysis, every decision remains structurally uncertain - regardless of experience, intuition or consensus.

This article explains what a decision space is, why it grows exponentially, why classical decision-making processes cannot capture it structurally and how modern decision intelligence systems calculate this space in order to mathematically identify the global optimum.

1. What a decision space really is

A decision space is the complete set of all possible decision states of a system.

Each point represents a complete decision configuration

The decision space is discrete - not continuous

A strategic decision space is not a continuous space, but a discrete combinatorial space. This means that every possible decision exists as a clearly defined, isolated state. There are no intermediate values or smooth transitions between these states.

Described formally:

x ∈ {0,1}N

Where means:

  • x = concrete decision combination
  • N = number of available decision options
  • {0,1} = decision is made or not made

Example:

An organization plans 20 projects. Each project can either be implemented or not implemented.

The decision space contains:

220 = 1,048,576 possible combinations

Not 20 decisions. But over a million possible decision states.

Each of these combinations leads to a different overall result.

2. Why decision spaces grow exponentially

The decisive mathematical mechanism is combinatorics.

Each additional option doubles the decision space.

Number of options Number of combinations Interpretation
10 1.024 fully analyzable
20 1.048.576 already complex
30 1.073.741.824 practically no longer manually analyzable
50 1.125.899.906.842.624 structurally invisible for conventional methods
100 1.267.650.600.228.229.401.496.703.205.376 beyond human imagination

The crucial point is not the number of projects. It is the number of combinations.

3. Why traditional decision-making processes are structurally limited

Traditional decision-making processes are based on:

  • Individual evaluation of projects
  • Prioritization through scoring
  • Experience and intuition
  • Consensus processes

These methods look at projects in isolation.

The problem is structural: the actual benefit arises at the combination level.

Example:

Project A alone generates limited benefits.
Project B alone generates limited benefits.
Project A + B together generate disproportionate benefits.

This combinatorial effect is not visible in isolation.

The optimal decision is therefore a property of the decision space - not of individual projects.

4. The difference between evaluation and calculation

Evaluation answers the question:

"How good is this single option?"

Calculation answers the question:

"Which combination of all options produces the best overall result?"

This difference is fundamental.

Valuation Calculation
local perspective global perspective
isolated analysis systemic analysis
subjectively influenceable mathematically unambiguous
no guarantee of optimality global optimum identifiable

5. The decision space is structurally invisible

The decision space exists regardless of whether it is calculated or not.

Without calculation, it remains invisible.

Decisions are then based on:

  • Partial information
  • Simplifications
  • Heuristics

The result can be good.

But it is not guaranteed to be optimal.

6. The role of the target function

To calculate a decision space, an objective function is defined:

max f(x)

This function describes the total benefit of a decision combination.

Examples:

The aim is to find the combination for which f(x) is maximum.

7. Constraints define the reality

Decisions always exist under constraints.

Example:

Σ cost(x) ≤ budget

Further constraints can be:

  • Project dependencies
  • Resource limits
  • strategic priorities

The optimal solution exists within these limits.

8. Why simulation is not enough

Simulation analyzes samples of the decision space.

Optimization analyzes the structure of the decision space.

Simulation can find good solutions.

Optimization can identify the global optimum.

That is a crucial difference.

9. Calculating the global optimum

The global optimum is the combination with the maximum value of the objective function.

Formal:

x* = argmax f(x)

This combination is mathematically unique.

It exists regardless of whether it is intuitively recognizable.

10. Strategic importance for organizations

The ability to calculate decision spaces fundamentally changes decision-making processes.

The focus is shifting from:

  • Opinions
  • Priorities
  • Intuition

towards:

11. Executive FAQ

What does it mean to calculate a decision space?

It means systematically analyzing all possible combinations of decision options and identifying the combination that generates the maximum overall benefit.

Why is the globally optimal result not intuitively visible?

Because the decision space grows exponentially and the global relationship between options cannot be recognized in isolation.

Why are classic prioritization methods not sufficient?

Because they evaluate options in isolation and do not take their combinatorial interactions into account.

Is the global optimum subjective?

No. It is a mathematical property of the decision space based on the objective function and constraints.

What is the strategic advantage of the decision space calculation?

It makes it possible to identify the best possible decision within all available alternatives.

Does this replace human decision-making processes?

No. It enhances them with complete structural transparency about all possible alternatives.

12. Executive Conclusion

Every strategic decision exists within a decision space that is exponentially larger than the number of visible options. This space contains not only the chosen decision, but all possible alternatives - including the optimal one.

Without calculation, this space remains structurally invisible. Decisions are then based on partial information and intuition.

The ability to fully calculate the decision space makes it possible for the first time to make strategic decisions on the basis of complete combinatorial transparency.

The result is not just a good decision.

It is the best possible decision within the given reality.

Calculate decision space now

Author: Sascha Rissel CEO mAInthink

Sascha Rissel is an entrepreneur, strategic advisor, and technology visionary with more than 20 years of experience in the development, scaling, and optimization of complex business models. He combines deep business expertise with a strong technological understanding, particularly in the areas of artificial intelligence, algorithmic decision models, and system optimization.

Through initiatives such as StratePlan and DeepAnT, he actively drives the advancement of data-driven ROI calculation, intelligent project prioritization, and predictive analytics. His focus is on measurable impact, robust decision foundations, and translating highly complex mathematical models into practical, deployable solutions for business, public administration, and industry.

Sascha Rissel stands for a clear principle: consistently aligning strategy, technology, and impact.

Industry / CAPEX

End guesswork for investments in the millions

Calculate business and investment decisions now
Check investment potential

Public Sector

Too many projects, too little budget

Calculate more projects with the same budget
Analyze budget potential
Subscribe to newsletter
Privacy
By selecting continue you confirm that you have read our and accepted our .
Fields marked with asterisks (*) are required.