Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

Same projects. Different combination. Greater results.

You can achieve higher returns with your existing projects.

We calculate the optimum scenario - before you decide.

Free of charge. Without obligation. Based on your existing projects.

StratePlan calculates the optimal portfolio where traditional tools reach their limits.

Instead of evaluating projects in isolation, we analyze all possible combinations - and identify the best solution.

The global optimum is not an assumption - it can be calculated.

Select business area:

Online Decision Service


- Calculating decisions instead of estimating scenarios

Classification

Today, companies, investors and public institutions are not faced with an information problem. Data is available, systems are established and reports are generated regularly. Nevertheless, studies, project results and real capital allocations show the same pattern again and again: Decisions remain systematically suboptimal, especially when multiple projects, limited budgets, conflicting objectives and uncertainty all have an impact at the same time.

The Online Decision Service addresses precisely this gap. It transfers mathematically based decision optimization into a web-based format that can be used immediately, directly usable format. The aim is not better planning, but predictably better decisions.

Try the online Decision Service now

1. The structural problem of classic decision-making

1.1 Decisions under complexity

In practice, decisions are often made under implicit assumptions:

  • The number of relevant options is manageable
  • Projects can be evaluated in isolation
  • Interactions are negligible
  • Experience and intuition compensate for uncertainty

These assumptions break down as soon as real complexity sets in. Even with just a few projects with several options for action, the decision space grows exponentially. From this point onwards, it is no longer possible to fully evaluate all permissible combinations - neither with Excel neither with Excel nor with classic scenario planning.

The result is well known:
It is not the best decision that is made, but the most plausible one.

1.2 Why more data does not solve the problem

ERP, BI and FP&A systems are excellent at mapping operational reality:

  • Actual figures
  • Forecasts
  • Budgets
  • Variances
  • Scenarios

What they do not do structurally is to calculate the optimal decision point within a high-dimensional decision space. They reduce complexity - they do not solve it.

The bottleneck lies not in the availability of data, but in the decision logic.

2. What makes an online decision service fundamentally different

2.1 From planning to optimization

An online decision service takes a different approach:

  • Not: What happens if we choose option A?
  • But rather: Which combination of all options maximizes the defined goal under given constraints?

This shifts the focus from scenarios to optimization problems.

2.2 The decision space as a mathematical object

Every strategic decision can be formalized by

  • Projects (i = 1 ... n)
  • Options per project
  • Costs / investments
  • Expected returns / effects
  • Restrictions (budget, risk, ESG, resources)

The set of all permissible decisions forms a discrete, combinatorial space. This space is:

  • non-linear
  • not intuitively comprehensible
  • no longer completely enumerable from a few dimensions upwards

An online decision service models this space explicitly - and calculates it.

3. Architecture of an online decision service

3.1 Input: Minimal, structured, anonymizable

A central principle is the reduction of data to decision relevance. Typically, the following are required:

  • Project ID
  • Investment value
  • Expected benefit (e.g. ROI, impact, score)
  • Optional: weightings, restrictions, dependencies

Narrative texts, justifications or strategic stories are not required and are not processed and are not processed. The service works exclusively with numerical values.

3.2 Processing: Algorithmic decision calculation

Mathematical optimization methods are used at the core, including

  • combinatorial optimization
  • Mixed integer models
  • heuristic and hybrid methods
  • Parallelization for space exploration

The crucial point:
Not individual projects are evaluated, but entire portfolios at the same time.

3.3 Output: Optimal decision instead of recommendation

The result is not a report, but a concrete set of decisions:

  • Which projects will be implemented
  • Which options are selected
  • Which budgets are allocated
  • Which combination is objectively optimal in the defined target system

Optionally supplemented by:

  • Deviation from the actual decision
  • Percentage improvement in efficiency or ROI
  • Sensitivity indicators

4. The difference to consulting and traditional consulting

4.1 No opinion, no narrative

An online decision service does not replace experience - it it replaces opinions where math is superior.

  • No workshops to reach a consensus
  • No PowerPoint strategies
  • No heuristic prioritizations

Instead: A calculated solution that is independent of hierarchies, Interests or cognitive biases.

4.2 Advice becomes verifiable

External recommendations can be quantitatively validated for the first time:

  • Is the recommended strategy optimal?
  • How far is it from the mathematical optimum?
  • What opportunity costs arise from deviations?

The Online Decision Service thus becomes a reference framework for decision quality.

5. Typical use cases

5.1 Corporate strategy & investments

  • Project portfolios
  • CAPEX allocation
  • Innovation roadmaps
  • M&A prioritization

5.2 Public sector & infrastructure

  • Budget allocation
  • Programs of measures
  • Maximizing impact with a fixed budget
  • Transparent basis for decision-making

5.3 Private Equity & Asset Management

  • Portfolio structuring
  • Investment sequences
  • Risk/return optimization
  • Scenario comparison at portfolio level

6. Why "online" is crucial

6.1 Low barriers to entry

An online decision service lowers structural barriers:

  • No months-long project
  • No consulting contract
  • No internal modeling project

The decision is calculated on demand.

6.2 Speed as a competitive advantage

While traditional decision-making processes take weeks or months an online service delivers:

Upload → Calculation → Result
in minutes or seconds

In dynamic markets, time itself becomes a decision variable.

7. Governance, traceability, responsibility

7.1 No "black box" substitute for responsibility

An online decision service does not make decisions for management. It shows:

  • What would be objectively optimal
  • Under explicit assumptions and goals

The responsibility remains with the decision-maker - but at a higher level of rationality.

7.2 Transparency through formalization

Every decision becomes comprehensible because:

  • Goals are explicitly defined
  • Restrictions are visible
  • Deviations are measurable

Strategic discussions shift from opinions to model assumptions.

8. Economic effect

Real-life applications regularly show that

  • significant efficiency gains
  • higher return on investment
  • better target achievement with the same budget

The effect is not due to better data but through complete calculation of the decision space.

9. Differentiation from AI hype and buzzwords

An online decision service is:

  • not generative AI
  • not a chatbot
  • not a forecasting tool
  • no reporting system

It is a decision-making computer for problems that are no longer structurally solvable by humans.

10. Conclusion

The Online Decision Service marks a paradigm shift:

Away from plausible decisions
to calculated decisions

In a world of exponential complexity, decision quality is becoming is becoming the limiting factor in economic and social development. Systems that address this bottleneck are not a future issue - they are a logical consequence they are a logical consequence.

The Online Decision Service is no substitute for strategy.
It is an instrument for checking strategy mathematically for the first time.

Test the online Decision Service now

Author: Dr. Igor Kadoshchuk CTO mAInthink

Dr. Igor Kadoshchuk is a computer scientist, algorithm architect, and one of the leading minds behind mAInthink's optimization and decision-making algorithms. As scientific director of the StratePlan™ and DeepAnT platforms, he combines in-depth mathematical research with practical applications in project portfolio optimization, business, finance, and public administration.

He holds a PhD in computer science from the renowned Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT), where he also taught as a professor of computer engineering and mathematics. He has decades of experience developing highly complex mathematical models for project portfolio optimization and financial systems, investment planning, and strategic decision-making. His professional career includes leading positions such as Head of IT at Gazprombank and Director of Project Management at TransTeleCom.

Dr. Kadoshchuk writes on the mAInthink AI Blog. Kadoshchuk on:

  • Algorithmic strategy optimization
  • New methods for calculating ROI and impact
  • Project portfolio optimization beyond traditional tools
  • The limits of human decision-making – and how AI overcomes them

His aim: to calculate strategy, not estimate it.

His contributions combine scientific precision with clear, understandable language – always with the goal of making complex decision-making spaces transparent, manageable, and measurable.

Industry / CAPEX

End guesswork for investments in the millions

Calculate business and investment decisions now
Check investment potential

Public Sector

Too many projects, too little budget

Calculate more projects with the same budget
Analyze budget potential
Subscribe to newsletter
Privacy
By selecting continue you confirm that you have read our and accepted our .
Fields marked with asterisks (*) are required.