Same projects. Different combination. Greater results.
You can achieve higher returns with your existing projects.
We calculate the optimum scenario - before you decide.
Free of charge. Without obligation. Based on your existing projects.
StratePlan calculates the optimal portfolio where traditional tools reach their limits.
Instead of evaluating projects in isolation, we analyze all possible combinations - and identify the best solution.
The global optimum is not an assumption - it can be calculated.
Select business area:
Blog main article:
Rethinking PE portfolio optimization: Why FLOP-HOP-TOP models fall short
Private equity decisions have followed a tried and tested pattern for decades: projects and investments are roughly categorized as FLOP, HOP and TOP. The logic behind this is clear, easy to understand and, at first glance, efficient efficient at first glance.
- FLOP: low return, high risk
- HOP: medium return, development potential
- TOP: highest return, strategically attractive
The PE manager logically opts for the TOP project - because it promises the highest immediate return. But this is precisely where the structural problem of classic portfolio logic lies.
The illusion of the "best" project
FLOP-HOP-TOP models evaluate projects in isolation and often only at the top level. They answer the question: Which individual project brings the most? But they do not answer it:
- How do projects influence each other?
- Which sub-projects act as levers?
- Where do synergies or cannibalization arise?
- Which combination generates the maximum overall impact of the fund?
In practice, this means that the project classified as TOP is often only "top" because its context is ignored.
The blind spot of classic PE software
Even modern, high-priced PE portfolio tools come up against a hard limit here. They can compare projects, Aggregate KPIs and simulate linear scenarios. What they cannot do is provide a simultaneous, mathematically complete Analysis of all project and sub-project combinations across FLOP, HOP and TOP.
Why? Because complexity is growing exponentially - and this is exactly where traditional systems break down.
StratePlan: Portfolio optimization at sub-project level
StratePlan takes a fundamentally different approach. Instead of pigeonholing projects, StratePlan analyzes them:
- all projects
- all sub-projects
- all interactions
- all combinations - simultaneously
It is irrelevant whether a sub-project was originally classified as FLOP, HOP or TOP. The decisive factor is its Effect in the overall system.
Practical example from a PE portfolio
Simplified example:
- TOP project: platform acquisition, expected ROI: 28%
- HOP project: process digitalization in a portfolio company, ROI in isolation: 12%
- FLOP project: Partial IT modernization in a marginal company, ROI in isolation: 4%
Classic model: Investment exclusively in the TOP project.
StratePlan analysis: Combination of selected sub-projects from HOP and FLOP reduces operating costs, increases scalability and accelerates synergy effects in the TOP project and accelerates synergy effects in the TOP project.
Result: ROI of the TOP project increases from 28% to over 45%. The overall portfolio impact increases by more than 60 % - with a simultaneous reduction in risk thanks to greater operational stability.
Why even top PE software cannot do this
The reason is not a lack of intelligence, but a mathematical limitation. Above a certain number of projects, there are billions to trillions of possible combinations. Traditional tools reduce this complexity - StratePlan calculates it.
StratePlan uses hybrid AI, optimization and multithreading algorithms to:
- evaluate all combinations
- Correctly allocate impact contributions
- Make cannibalization effects visible
- Systematically maximize synergies
Conclusion: The best project is rarely the best decision
Private equity does not fail due to a lack of capital or experience, but due to the illusion of isolated excellence. The optimal portfolio is not created by the best individual project, but by the best combination - often across FLOP, HOP and TOP.
StratePlan makes precisely this visible.
Strategy in. Optimal decision out.
Comparison: Classic PE logic vs. StratePlan
| Category | Classic FLOP-HOP-TOP model | StratePlan Superintelligence |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation level | Individual project (top level) | Overall portfolio incl. sub-projects |
| Decision logic | Selection of the "best" individual project | Optimal combination of all projects |
| Dealing with FLOP projects | Exclusion | Analysis at sub-project & synergy level |
| Dealing with HOP projects | Optional, often ignored | Active impact & leverage component |
| Synergies | Implicit / manually estimated | Algorithmically calculated |
| Cannibalization | Hardly recognizable | Systematically identified & eliminated |
| Complexity | Greatly reduced | Fully modeled |
| Computational approach | Linear, heuristic | Exponential, multithreaded |
| ROI optimization | Project-based | Portfolio & system-related |
| Typical ROI gain | 0-10 % | 20-60 %, in individual cases more |
| Software limit | >5-7 projects | >100 projects manageable |
| Decision quality | Experience-driven | Mathematically optimal |
FAQ: PE portfolio optimization with StratePlan
What is StratePlan in the context of private equity?
StratePlan is an AI- and algorithm-based decision intelligence for portfolio, project and investment optimization. For PE funds, this means maximizing the impact of existing capital by optimally combining projects and sub-projects.
Does StratePlan replace the PE manager?
No. StratePlan does not replace experience or strategy, but provides a mathematically sound basis for decision-making, that can no longer be calculated by humans or with traditional tools.
Why is the FLOP-HOP-TOP model problematic?
Because it evaluates projects in isolation. It does not reliably recognize that seemingly weak projects can act as levers, enablers or synergy drivers and thus significantly improve TOP projects.
Aren't FLOP projects bad by definition?
Viewed in isolation, yes. However, in the portfolio context, partial measures from FLOP projects can have a significant positive effect on TOP projects projects, e.g. through cost reduction, scaling or risk minimization.
Why do PE managers still opt for TOP projects?
Because classic models force quick decisions and do not provide a mathematically clean alternative at combination level. The TOP project is then the seemingly "safe" choice.
What makes StratePlan technically different?
StratePlan analyzes billions of project and sub-project combinations simultaneously. It does not artificially reduce complexity, but calculates it - with the help of hybrid optimization methods and precise multithreading.
Why can't traditional PE tools do this?
Because the number of possible combinations grows exponentially (2N). From approx. 7-10 projects onwards, a complete analysis with with classic tools is practically impossible. StratePlan is built precisely for this complexity zone.
How can StratePlan increase the ROI of a TOP project by 60 %?
Through the targeted combination of sub-projects from HOP and FLOP areas that indirectly leverage the TOP project: Reduce costs, shorten lead times, defuse dependencies, activate synergies and avoid cannibalization.
Isn't that theoretical?
No. Such effects have been achieved in practice - especially where portfolios contain many dependencies, shared services, platform levers or operational bottlenecks, Platform levers or operational bottlenecks.
How time-consuming is the introduction of StratePlan?
StratePlan can be introduced step by step - starting with existing project, CapEx/OpEx, KPI and schedule data. The greatest added value is created when the overall portfolio view is consistently modeled.
Does the entire portfolio have to be modeled?
Recommended yes, as synergies, conflicts and leverage effects arise across departments and divisions. Partial optimizations are possible, but typically lead to lower effects than overall portfolio optimization.
Is StratePlan fund- or sector-dependent?
No. StratePlan works across all sectors: Industry, Software, Infrastructure, Healthcare, Services, Public Sector and more. The decisive factors are structured goals, restrictions and metrics - not the sector.
Can StratePlan be combined with existing PE software?
Yes, StratePlan complements existing systems by providing the mathematical optimization layer. Reporting, Dataroom, Portfolio and KPI tools can still be used.
Does StratePlan increase the risk?
On the contrary. StratePlan reduces risk by explicitly modeling dependencies, sensitivities, cannibalization and conflicting objectives and pricing them into the optimal decision.
Can the results be explained?
Yes, StratePlan provides comprehensible decision logic, impact contributions and justifications - suitable for investment committees, Board and stakeholder communication.
What is the strategic benefit for PE funds?
A structural competitive advantage: a higher portfolio impact is achieved with the same amount of capital than with traditional approaches. It is not the best individual project that wins - but the best combination.
What is the real game changer?
The ability to not only evaluate FLOP, HOP and TOP, but to combine them intelligently - at project and sub-project level, under real restrictions and in seconds.
Sascha Rissel is an entrepreneur, strategic advisor, and technology visionary with more than 20 years of experience in the development, scaling, and optimization of complex business models. He combines deep business expertise with a strong technological understanding, particularly in the areas of artificial intelligence, algorithmic decision models, and system optimization.
Through initiatives such as StratePlan and DeepAnT, he actively drives the advancement of data-driven ROI calculation, intelligent project prioritization, and predictive analytics. His focus is on measurable impact, robust decision foundations, and translating highly complex mathematical models into practical, deployable solutions for business, public administration, and industry.
Sascha Rissel stands for a clear principle: consistently aligning strategy, technology, and impact.